Security Incidents mailing list archives
Re: Trojan of somesort - Update
From: Derek <cissp_ds () cox net>
Date: 27 May 2004 18:36:50 -0000
In-Reply-To: <182030000.1085678189 () utd49554 utdallas edu> Paul Schmehl said: ------------------
Good luck scanning for ports. The ports they use are completely arbitrary and infinitely changeable.
[snip]
I have port scanned *known* tagged boxes and found nothing to raise suspicions. These guys aren't stupid. They're going to try and make the box look as normal as possible. Some of them even moderate downloads and uploads to try and stay under the radar and not raise suspicion due to unusual traffic patterns.
And using port knocking will make things even more invisible. Anyone seen RATs using this? Derek
Current thread:
- RE: Trojan of somesort - Update, (continued)
- RE: Trojan of somesort - Update James C Slora Jr (May 29)
- RE: Trojan of somesort - Update Harlan Carvey (May 28)
- Re: Trojan of somesort - Update Gadi Evron (May 28)
- Re: Trojan of somesort - Update Paul Schmehl (May 28)
- Re: Trojan of somesort - Update Harlan Carvey (May 28)
- Re: Trojan of somesort - Update Gadi Evron (May 28)
- Changing file times, was -> Re: Trojan of somesort - Update Harlan Carvey (May 28)
- Re: Changing file times, was -> Re: Trojan of somesort - Update Gadi Evron (May 28)
- RE: Trojan of somesort - Update David Gillett (May 28)
- Re: Trojan of somesort - Update Harlan Carvey (May 28)
- Administrivia: Trojan of somesort - Hack definition branch == dead Daniel Hanson (May 29)
