Security Incidents mailing list archives
Re: SSH probes?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 10:20:17 -0400
On Wed, 12 May 2004 09:03:57 BST, iglope said:
one time we have : authentication failure;May 9 21:35:10 evita sshd(pam_unix)[16374]: check pass; user unknownAnother we have : check pass; user unknown isn't a way to discover a valid user for next brute force session ? may be u have to tune your ssh to send the same msg for valid and invalid user ?
*You*, as the system admin, are told whether it's a valid userid with a bad password, or an invalid userid - because your reaction to the incident may differ based on which it is. That doesn't mean that the attacker/user *at the far end* is able to detect the distinction. Having said that, there *was* an issue with SSH and PAM support a while ago, where a timing attack would tell you which it was. It shouldn't be an issue if you're at a current release....
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- SSH probes? Devdas Bhagat (May 10)
- RE: SSH probes? Jerry Shenk (May 10)
- Re: SSH probes? iglope (May 12)
- Re: SSH probes? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 12)
- Re: SSH probes? Klaus Lichtenwalder (May 12)
- Re: SSH probes? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 12)
