Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: COMMUNAL BROADBRAND/Neighbors sharing high-speed Internet access via wireless networks is popular and controversial


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 18:59:28 -0500


Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 11:08:39 -0800
From: Paul Saffo <psaffo () iftf org>
To: Dave Farber <farber () cis upenn edu>

Dave-

Interesting piece on how us neighborly San Francisquenos are driving the
telecom establishment nuts.  AT&T is just jealous, 'cause at the rate things
are going, some neighborhood hackers may end up having more sub-subscribers
than AT&T has accounts!
-p


----------------------------------------------------------------------
The original article can be found on SFGate.com here:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2001/12/19/BU44717.DTL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday, December 19, 2001 (SF Chronicle)
COMMUNAL BROADBRAND/Neighbors sharing high-speed Internet access via
wireless networks is popular and controversial
Matthew Yi, Chronicle Staff Writer


   Sean Berry shares his broadband Internet connection with three neighbors
-
- including one across the street -- but doesn't have any wires running
out of his windows or doors.
   And in return, his neighbors sometimes pitch in to help pay the monthly
$80 DSL service fee.
   "There's no formal money that changes hands. I'm not looking to make any
money on it, but they do chip in every once in a while," said Berry, a
27-year- old Unix systems engineer who lives in a one-bedroom apartment in
Menlo Park. "It's about the same rate as people chipping in for pizza."
   With the cost of rigging local-area, high-speed wireless networks
plunging
during the past couple of years, some tech-savvy Bay Area neighbors are
finding economies in sharing broadband Internet service.
   The movement is rubbing at least one broadband service provider the wrong
way.
   "We view it the same way as cable theft . . . and that's against a
variety
of state and federal laws," said Andrew Johnson, spokesman for AT&T
Broadband, which provides cable modem service to 1.4 million customers
across the nation.
   The cable company even conducts flyovers in selected areas twice a year
looking for any unauthorized "leakages" of cable TV and broadband signals,
he said. When found, AT&T said it simply disconnects the customer.
   While there may be some who splice and split broadband connections
illegally, there are plenty of ways to share bandwidth legally, users say.
   And many are finding online groups such as the Bay Area Wireless User
Group to swap ideas on how to do it.
   The user group, which began a year ago, now has about 1,200 people in its
digital ranks. The list of techies who publicize their own wireless
networks on the group's Web site for others to use for free has grown from
just a few to more than 20 in a year.
   "And that's just the tip of the iceberg," said Tim Pozar, co-founder of
the user group. He shares his wireless network and DSL connection with his
next- door neighbor and a friend two blocks away, using a directional
antenna atop his three-story Sunset District home in San Francisco.
   The technology that enables this sharing is 802.11, also known as Wi-Fi,
which can be found in such consumer products as Apple's AirPort, Lucent's
Orinoco and Intel's AnyPoint II Wireless Home Networking Kit.
   With a range of little more than 100 feet, the gear is designed to help
users wirelessly connect their broadband-linked desktop computer to
laptops, PDAs or other peripherals such as printers and scanners.
   But if you attach an external antenna, the range can easily go beyond
just
a couple of hundred feet.
   And more importantly, the cost of setting up such networks has dropped
substantially, from more than $2,000 two years ago to about $300 to $400
or even lower, depending on the latest closeout sales.
   The network typically has one access point device tethered to a desktop
computer and uses radio signals to communicate with other computers or
devices.
   That's what Berry has done. Using an external antenna to increase the
range,
   his next-door neighbors, friends who live a floor below and other friends
across the street can all tap into his network and the Internet.
   "It's wonderful stuff," Berry said. "I work in the tech industry, so it's
fun to play with this stuff at home."
   Others have taken ideas off the Internet, such as using a Pringles potato
chip can to build a directional antenna with a range that extends for
miles.
   "Hey, it cost me $6 (for parts) and it works," said Sameer Verma,
assistant processor of information systems at San Francisco State
University.
   Raines Cohen and 19 other neighbors in their downtown Oakland condo
building each pay $4 for their DSL connection by sharing a single $80 DSL
line using a combination of traditional Ethernet connections -- which the
building developer installed before the residents moved in -- plus a
wireless network.
   "It is a backdoor way of saving money," said Cohen, a 35-year-old
software
consultant. "All our neighbors (which include nurses, teachers, retirees
and architects) now have computers at home and several have laptops using
the wireless connection."
   While cable modem carriers such as AT&T may have stringent rules about
sharing bandwidth outside the customer's home, some DSL providers are lax
about the issue.
   "We don't think it's good policy to open up your line to people you're
not
responsible for, but it's not an expressly forbidden policy," said Hunter
Middleton, Covad's group manager of consumer product marketing.
   He said customers need to know there are potential liabilities, such as
unauthorized users downloading illegal material like child pornography,
and that sharing bandwidth with others may slow the connection speed.
   "It seems like a lot of effort for a service that's fairly low priced,"
Middleton said, noting that DSL services can be had for as little as $50
per month.
   Pacific Bell also doesn't specifically forbid the practice, but does
discourage customers from doing it, said Shawn Dainas, spokesman for SBC
Communications, the utility's parent company.
   "It's not in the policy, but that's not the intended use," he said.
   Dave Solomon, systems administrator at an East Bay Internet service
provider, Idiom.com, said his company doesn't mind customers sharing
connections.
   "The angle most smaller ISPs will take is that this will make our
customers happier, and happy customers are what we're looking for," he
said.
   But security is something users need to be aware of because the current
encryption standard on Wi-Fi networks -- known as Wired Equivalent
Privacy, or WEP -- has been broken, said Tony Bautts, a security design
consultant who currently works for Wells Fargo Bank.
   The bottom line is that hacking into a wireless network is "really,
really
easy," he said.
   An 802.11 industry group plans to announce a fix to the WEP security
problems in existing units next month, while continuing to work for a more
complete solution in future products.
   For now, though, not only can hackers tap into the wireless network
bandwidth, they can also look through files in your hard drive -- a
dangerous proposition, especially if the user keeps such information as
bank account and credit card numbers on the computer. There are ways to
keep people out of the computer files -- such as instructing your OS to
not share files -- but these are precautionary steps wireless network
users must actively pursue, Bautts said.
   Despite these possible pitfalls, the benefits do outweigh the downsides,
especially if proper precautions are taken, users say.
   "You don't trip over Ethernet cords, I take my laptop to the kitchen to
look up recipes, take it outside when the weather's nice . . . and I have
social contact with others using the network," Berry said.
   E-mail Matthew Yi at myi () sfchronicle com.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright 2001 SF Chronicle


------ End of Forwarded Message

For archives see:
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


Current thread: