Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: Remember ITAR?


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 21:31:45 -0500


Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:15:45 -0500
To: farber () cis upenn edu
From: "David P. Reed" <dpreed () reed com>
Subject: Remember ITAR?

The following lecture is likely to be very important, especially because it recognizes the potential for a new wave of repression masquerading as national security.

Those of us who remember trying to put end-to-end encryption and authentication in TCP, and the RSA and Diffie-Hellman public-key research, remember ITAR, if not fondly, at least vividly. Largely because of flawed thinking on the part of "export control" policymakers, technologies that could have protected our entire commercial infrastructure from information warfare and terrorism were inhibited from wide and standard use.

If indeed a return to a much expanded ITAR structure is beginning to be floated as a way to achieve national security, my country has a problem - a very large one. One of perspective about the costs of damaging the essential nature of our knowledge generating enterprise. And at the same time, risking a change from a resilient society to a fragile one based on an extremely brittle defense strategy founded on a false premise - that ideas and science can be blocked at borders.

A strong patriotism calls for fighting against this attempt to point the barrel of a military musket against our own temples of knowledge and creativity. Our society's brains are not a cancer to be contained and shut away incommunicado in a dungeon.

Though many US computer researchers owe much to ARPA funding, this is not the time to worry about whether you might be biting the hand that feeds you by pointing out the folly of expanding ITAR. It's time to stand up and make it clear that, as Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who earned the US Intelligence Medal, is noted to have said: "Secrecy is for losers".

- David


Subject: Lewis M. Branscomb Lecture Series, December 17, 2001, "Research Values and
 National Security: Can Traditional Values Survive?"
To: HIIP () harvard edu
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.4  June 8, 2000
From: HIIP () harvard edu
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 17:20:19 -0500
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on KSGMTA/KSG(Release 5.0.3 |March 21, 2000) at 11/26/2001
 05:25:19 PM
X-RCPT-TO: <dpreed () reed com>

The Harvard Information Infrastructure Project
and
Science, Technology, and Public Policy Program
present the

Lewis M. Branscomb Lecture Series

We invite you to participate

with

Dr. Eugene B. Skolnikoff

Professor of Political Science Emeritus
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
on

"Research Universities and National Security:
Can Traditional Values Survive?"

Monday, December 17, 2001, 3:30-5:00 p.m.
5th floor, Taubman Building
John F. Kennedy School of Government

Reception to follow

Please respond by December 10 to:
Ms. Kimberley Ednie
tel.  617-496-5584
email kimberley_ednie () ksg harvard edu

The nature of the national security challenges to the nation
have changed from the time of the Cold War, with much
greater attention to the danger of proliferation of military
capabilities to a wide range of states and non-state actors.
This has led to more restrictive implementation of export
control regulations by the federal government, focused in
particular on space science and space technologies. This
preceded September 11, but now is likely to become a more
prominent issue. The most significant problems to date arise
in the application of the International Traffic in Arms
Regulations (ITAR) to the space sciences in the universities
and industry. The effects have seriously disrupted the
normal working practices of many of the scientists involved
and have raised questions about international cooperation,
openness of information, relations with foreign graduate
students, and working patterns with industry.

A discussion of some of the basic characteristics of
technology, of how the scientific enterprise in the US has
changed, and of how the research universities have evolved
in recent years will give a framework to anticipate how the
ITAR and other security issues may unfold in the near
future. Many other fields of science and technology may well
become subject to export controls, since the ITAR gives
license, if agencies choose to use it, to control any
subject with possible military application. This could have
profound implications for the research universities,
affecting faculty, foreign students, and foreign postdocs,
and international relationships generally in research. Some
concerted action on the part of the universities is clearly
necessary to suggest what restrictions may be appropriate
and what are not, in the face of what is a legitimate danger
to the nation.

Dr. Eugene Skolnikoff has focused his research and teaching
interests in the fields of science policy and international
affairs, with a strong emphasis on the political changes
brought about by rapid scientific and technological change.
He was on the White House Staff in the office of the Science
Adviser in the administrations of Eisenhower, Kennedy (1958-
63) and Carter (1977-81), and has been a consultant to
various government agencies, including the Departments of
State, Energy and Defense, the National Science Foundation,
and Congress' Office of Technology Assessment, as well as to
international organizations, private foundations, and
industry.  Dr. Skolnikoff is currently on several National
Research Council committees and is presently Chair of the
Board of the UN University Institute for New Technology
(INTECH) in Maastricht, Holland.  He was also a member of
the Board of Trustees of the German Marshall Fund of the
United States, an American foundation, from 1979-87, serving
as Chair from 1980-86.  He has been decorated by the German
and Japanese Governments and is a Fellow of the American
Academy of Arts and Sciences and of the American Association
for the Advancement of Science. Dr. Skolnikoff has published
numerous articles and several books, including particularly,
The Elusive Transformation: Science, Technology, and the Evolution
of International Politics (Princeton University Press, 1993).



For archives see:
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


Current thread: