Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: And sometimes, banging on drums is better than the Net.


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:02:09 -0400


Reply-To: <ihopper () ap org>
From: "D. Ian Hopper" <ihopper () ap org>
To: <farber () cis upenn edu>

FYI...

^BC-Attacks-Cybertrail, Bjt,720<
^Foiling U.S. technology, bin Laden relies on little technology to
communicate<
^By D. IAN HOPPER=
^AP Technology Writer=
¶   WASHINGTON (AP) _ Despite warnings from top government officials that
terrorists would use exotic technology to communicate, suspected terrorist
mastermind Osama bin Laden instead has used "no-tech" methods, foiling
efforts to track him, former U.S. intelligence officials said.
¶   But there are some lingering electronic trails by his suspected
operatives being investigated by federal officials looking at how last
week's attackers used e-mail and the Internet.
¶   Intelligence agents once could keep tabs on bin Laden when he used a
satellite phone that could be picked up by U.S. spy gear and matched to his
voiceprint. That capability leaked to bin Laden, so he swore off talking on
the phone, according to Marc Enger, former director of operations at the Air
Intelligence Agency, the Air Force's intelligence arm.
¶   "So he switched a lot of communications technologies," Enger said.
"Unfortunately, now it is other people talking for him. In an innocuous
conversation, you can't pick that out."
¶   Bin Laden relies on human messengers, safe houses and close-knit groups
such as family members to send out his directives.
¶   "This isn't low-tech," said Wayne Madsen, a former communications
specialist for the National Security Agency. "You'd have to really call it
no-tech."
¶   Investigators think some of the hijackers may not have been as wary of
high-tech communications as bin Laden, whom the United States considers the
prime suspect in the attacks.
¶   After the attacks last week, investigators began working with major
Internet service providers like Earthlink and America Online to get
information about the hijackers' Internet habits. In Britain, law
enforcement agencies have asked Internet companies to keep traffic logs to
look for clues to the attacks.
¶   In March 2000, the CIA has warned about terrorist organizations using
secure Internet communications. CIA Director George Tenet told the Senate
then that several terrorist groups, including bin Laden's al-Qaida, "are
using computerized files, e-mail and encryption to support their
operations."
¶   "Terrorists also are embracing the opportunities offered by recent leaps
in information technology," Tenet said.
¶   Madsen said the hijackers could have communicated by means of seemingly
innocuous messages on Web sites, impervious to the most vaunted surveillance
tools in use by U.S. intelligence.
¶   "There might some minor change to a Web site that would indicate a plan,
because they knew it in advance. All the Carnivores and all the Echelons in
the world would do very little to hamper that kind of operation," referring
to the FBI's e-mail surveillance box and a widely suspected NSA surveillance
network.
¶   Enger said some U.S. agents have reported bin Laden has used
steganography _ the art of hiding a message in plain sight, such as a text
message hidden in a picture file _ and pornography Web sites to communicate.
Enger said those sites would be considered unlikely hiding places for a
devout Muslim like bin Laden.
¶   The use of racy pictures loaded with hidden messages is extremely
difficult to verify because the investigator first would have to know the
message was there, Enger said. Decrypting it presents another problem.
¶   "Unless you have the original photo file, you can't compare to see if
they've been changed," Enger said. He said the United States has looked for
new technology to overcome that hurdle.
¶   While the free, powerful encryption software available through the
Internet presents somewhat of a hurdle, that a message is encrypted can tip
off authorities. Sometimes, they also can figure out the sender and
recipient of the message even if the message itself is coded.
¶   Former NSA technician Madsen said the United States battled another
low-tech foe in recent years: Mohamed Farah Aidid, a Somalian warlord who
was the target of U.S. forces in 1993. Madsen said that instead of phones,
Aidid's forces banged out messages on drums.
¶   "Spy satellites can't pick that kind of stuff up," Madsen said.
¶   ^___=
¶   On the Net: Air Intelligence Agency: http://www.aia.af.mil
¶   National Security Agency: http://www.nsa.gov



For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/


Current thread: