more on with editorial comment djf Google refuses to speak with news organization after critical story... for one year [fs]

[David Farber <dave () farber net>]

Google seems insensitive to the fact that they are loosing the  
respect of much of the community. I and others , have suggested  that  
they create a Privacy Board of external independant people who can  
help steer Google in better directions then it seems to be doing. So  
far NOTHING!!

Dave



Begin forwarded message:

From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () cs columbia edu>
Date: August 7, 2005 6:20:16 PM EDT
To: dave () farber net
Subject: Re: [IP] Google refuses to speak with news organization  
after critical story... for one year [fs]


Will all due respect, the furor about Google, Eric Schmidt, and
CNET misses the point.  Yes, CNET learned some information about
Schmidt.  I dare say that much the same information could have been
garnered via MSN Search or Yahoo or any of a number of other search
engines.

The real issue -- and this is, in fact, the real point of the CNET
article -- is how much data Google collects and retains about people,
data that's tied to personally-identifiable information for
people who register for things like gmail.  Is CNET being targeted
because they published data on Schmidt, or because they said the
emperor -- emperors, really; they note that A9, MSN, Yahoo, etc.,
have similar issues -- have no clothes.


        --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb




-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/