Interesting People mailing list archives
more on Was the 2004 election stolen? No. | Salon.com News
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 08:37:44 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: Steven Hertzberg <stevenstevensteven () gmail com> Date: June 3, 2006 8:26:25 AM EDT To: dave () farber net Subject: RE: [IP] Was the 2004 election stolen? No. | Salon.com NewsThe results in Ohio and the Exit Poll have been thoroughly examined. An organization I am part of, the election science institute (esi), conducted an audit of 49 of the 88 counties in late 2004 and early 2005. While significant error was found, the error was found to be random. I also find it interesting that those who argue that the exit poll results were accurate have never performed an exit poll before - esi found some of the same factors in its new mexico exit poll as the NEM exit poll experienced in Ohio.
Finally, I'm quite concerned about the use of the election system as a political wedge. The election system clearly is in need of significant improvement, but this requires objective, rationale, scientific enquiry and system development.
________________________________ Steven Hertzberg www.hertzberg.org ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on Was the 2004 election stolen? No. | Salon.com News David Farber (Jun 03)
