
Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: A Service Message From FreeConference.com
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 09:59:15 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: "Atkinson, Robert" <rca53 () columbia edu> Date: March 17, 2007 8:44:29 AM EDT To: dave () farber net Subject: RE: [IP] Re: A Service Message From FreeConference.com This sounds like it would be similar to international telephone and fax services where an overseas user is assigned a phone number in a rural (typically Iowa)telephone exchange. A US caller/faxer then calls that number in Iowa where the call/fax is converted to IP for delivery to (typically) China. The money comes from the rural LEC's extremely high (5 cents/min or more) terminating interstate access charge. In the international service context, the Iowa RLEC probably keeps all of the money with the Chinese partner collecting a small fee from the subscriber in China. In the case of domestic conference calling, with multiple callers all calling into the Iowa exchange at 5 cents/min. access charge, there would be plenty of money to split with the owner/operator of the conference call bridge (if it isn't the RLEC itself.) In addition to this self-help "urban-to-rural" subsidy, the RLEC may also be getting Universal Service Fund payments. Sweet deal. A year or so ago (when I was Chair of NANC) I was told that there were at least 14 rural LECs in Iowa providing this service. There was some concern by state regulators that these services were exporting "local" telephone numbers at such a prodigious rate that new area codes would be required. Bob -----Original Message----- From: David Farber [mailto:dave () farber net] Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 8:05 AM To: ip () v2 listbox com Subject: [IP] Re: A Service Message From FreeConference.com Begin forwarded message: From: jordan pollack <pollack () brandeis edu> Date: March 16, 2007 10:36:37 PM EDT To: dave () farber net Subject: Re: [IP] Re: A Service Message From FreeConference.com Isn't there a piece of the story missing? I'm guessing that FreeConference makes its money on receiving some kind of origin/ destination settlements from the carriers, which might be REAL money from the wireless guys and the phonebooth guys. Anybody have any idea how free conferencing works as a business model, (since there is no google text ads read aloud while you wait for the calls:) jordan ------------------------------------------- Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/247/@now Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com ------------------------------------------- Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/247/@now Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- A Service Message From FreeConference.com David Farber (Mar 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: A Service Message From FreeConference.com David Farber (Mar 16)
- Re: A Service Message From FreeConference.com David Farber (Mar 16)
- Re: A Service Message From FreeConference.com David Farber (Mar 17)
- Re: A Service Message From FreeConference.com David Farber (Mar 17)
- Re: A Service Message From FreeConference.com David Farber (Mar 17)
- Re: A Service Message From FreeConference.com David Farber (Mar 17)
- Re: A Service Message From FreeConference.com David Farber (Mar 17)