Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: Did wiretap laws put soldiers at risk?
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:52:06 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: DV Henkel-Wallace <dvhw () talima com> Date: October 15, 2007 12:38:53 PM EDT To: dave () farber net Cc: h_bray () globe com Subject: Re: [IP] Did wiretap laws put soldiers at risk?No word in the article on why they didn't just use the 72-hr retroactive warrant clause. A case of imminent danger is exactly what that clause is for.
I agree, plenty of fat opportunities for grandstanding all around. -d ------------------------------------------- Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- Did wiretap laws put soldiers at risk? David Farber (Oct 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Did wiretap laws put soldiers at risk? David Farber (Oct 15)
- Re: Did wiretap laws put soldiers at risk? David Farber (Oct 15)
- Re: Did wiretap laws put soldiers at risk? David Farber (Oct 15)
- Re: Did wiretap laws put soldiers at risk? David Farber (Oct 15)
- Re: Did wiretap laws put soldiers at risk? David Farber (Oct 16)
