Re: Google Photographs in Public Places and So Do We

[David Farber <dave () farber net>]

________________________________________
From: Michael Zimmer [michael.zimmer () yale edu]
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 1:50 PM
To: David Farber
Subject: Re: [IP] Re:    Google Photographs in Public Places and So Do We

Then the question is, if the organizers of the trade show have no
restrictions on photography on their "private property," can Google, a
renter of space on that property, enforce their own restrictions?
-----
Michael Zimmer, PhD
Microsoft Fellow, Information Society Project
Yale Law School
e: michael.zimmer () yale edu
w: http://michaelzimmer.org


On Apr 28, 2008, at 11:57 AM, David Farber wrote:

> ________________________________________
> From: Samuel.Posten () L-3Com com [Samuel.Posten () L-3Com com]
> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 11:35 AM
> To: David Farber
> Subject: RE: [IP] Google Photographs in Public Places and So Do We
>
> Dave, I'm not a lawyer but I've been dealing with similar issues
> lately.  This guy is wrong.  He's at a trade show on private
> property.  The organizers are perfectly within their rights to
> restrict photography.  They'd probably be stupid and unsuccessful,
> but within their rights.
>
> -------------------------------------------
> Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
> RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com






-------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com