Re: weakness in the DNS protocol

[David Farber <dave () farber net>]

________________________________________
From: Dave Crocker [dcrocker () bbiw net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 7:43 PM
To: David Farber
Cc: ip; Steven M. Bellovin
Subject: Re: [IP] Re:   weakness in the DNS protocol

David Farber wrote:
> From: Steven M. Bellovin [smb () cs columbia edu]
...
> As ISC notes, DNSSEC is really the path we need to follow.


Work on DNSSec began almost 15 years ago, as a consequence of DNS
vulnerabilities being identified.  (I was the cognizant IETF Area Director who
initiated it.)

Yet we have virtually no adoption of DNSSec and no real plan for its adoption,
including signing the root or, ummm, routing around the DNSSec model's need for
signing the root.  Discussion about progress?  Sure.  Actually progress, no?

Most exchanges, like those that have just taken place on the IP list, simply end
by saying that DNSSec is the answer.  Unfortunately, that utterance does not
solve the problem.

We really do need to hear something that is more concrete, more pragmatic, and
more promising.

d/
--

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net



-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com