Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: "Redacted" DoJ PDFs still leaking confidential data
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 17:07:40 -0700
________________________________________
From: Peter Swire [peter () peterswire net]
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 8:00 PM
To: David Farber; mab () crypto com
Subject: RE: [IP] "Redacted" DoJ PDFs still leaking confidential data
Dave:
It is a public service for Matt Blaze to show the ineffectiveness of the DOJ’s redaction process.
In light of the government tendency to err on the side of secrecy, could Matt or other readers point us to high-quality
and easy-to-use ways to redact government (or other) documents? Do changes need to be made to widely-used word
processing and similar software?
If redaction is easy to hack, then DOJ and other agencies will try to prevent release of documents entirely.
Transparency, the Freedom of Information Act, etc. – strong reasons to have redaction be workable, or else the public
will see even less.
Peter
Prof. Peter P. Swire
C. William O'Neil Professor of Law
Moritz College of Law
The Ohio State University
Senior Fellow, Center for American Progress
(240) 994-4142, www.peterswire.net
<snip>
Data leaks from ineffectively redacted PDFs go back for
years, and the DoJ itself has been burned by this several
times already; one would think the government might have
learned by now. In this case, the "sensitive" data is
fairly innocuous (and, I'd argue, was data the public has a
legitimate right to know in any case). But if this represents
the DoJ's normal redaction practices, next time it could just
as easily be a court filing containing the names of
confidential informants.
Last night, after I blogged about it, the DoJ took the entire
web site for its Office of the Inspector General off the air,
presumably to check for other leaky PDFs.
For the original leaky PDF and context, see my
blog post at
http://www.crypto.com/blog/calea_retrobugs/
-matt
________________________________
Archives<http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now> [https://www.listbox.com/images/feed-icon-10x10.jpg]
<http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/>
[https://www.listbox.com/images/listbox-logo-small.jpg]<http://www.listbox.com>
-------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- "Redacted" DoJ PDFs still leaking confidential data David Farber (May 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: "Redacted" DoJ PDFs still leaking confidential data David Farber (May 17)
- Re: "Redacted" DoJ PDFs still leaking confidential data David Farber (May 17)
- Re: "Redacted" DoJ PDFs still leaking confidential data David Farber (May 17)
- Re: "Redacted" DoJ PDFs still leaking confidential data David Farber (May 18)
