
Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: Verdict: The Pirate Bay Guilty
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:28:32 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: Andy Oram <andyo () oreilly com> Date: April 17, 2009 9:17:46 AM EDT To: dave () farber net Subject: Re: [IP] Verdict: The Pirate Bay GuiltyUp until 1997, copyright infringement in the US was a civil matter. If you hurt me in some way, I can sue you; it doesn't have to be a criminal act. That view was applied implicitly to copyright infringement. If someone abuses your copyright, you sue.
It's a different matter when something is a crime: now the government is forced to police the territory and expend precious resources enforcing the law. I reported on this change in the US in a 1998 article (I don't know the history in Europe):
http://www.praxagora.com/andyo/ar/copyright_theft.html The Gifts That Keep On Giving--Copyright RevenuesI do believe that massive unauthorized sharing of copyrighted material is a crime. But we drug runners murdering people in the streets, thousands of workers being cheated out of wages by scufflaw employers, and all kinds of serious crimes that really threaten lives. It's not in the public interest to turn copyright infringement from a civil offense to a criminal one. And it leads to violations of privacy and civil liberties in ever-more desperate attempts to enforce laws.
Andy ------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- Verdict: The Pirate Bay Guilty David Farber (Apr 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Verdict: The Pirate Bay Guilty David Farber (Apr 17)
- Re: Verdict: The Pirate Bay Guilty David Farber (Apr 17)
- Re: Verdict: The Pirate Bay Guilty David Farber (Apr 18)