Metasploit mailing list archives
Re: vnc reverse question
From: neil-on-metasploit at restricted.dyndns.org (Neil)
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 17:20:17 -0500
For the win32_adduser, it's fine since the purpose of that is to really create a user. But what about the exploit(not payload), does it change anything likes files? Can we also safely say that after we reboot the affected machine, the system is back in state how it was prior to the attack? I think, the reason why I am asking this is because of the behavior of malicious worms. Even if we reboot an infected machine, the worm will still be there. Thanks. neil H D Moore writes:
The only Windows payloads which have the ability to modify the system are: - win32_exec: executes whatever command you want, which could modify.. - win32_adduser: creates a new local user account on the system - win32_*_uploadexec: uploads a file to c:\metasploit.exe and executes it After exploit certain system-level flaws, you should reboot the system to prevent any in-memory modifications from causing a crash at a later date. For instance, if you use the LSASS or MS03-026 exploits on an active domain controller, there is a small chance the system will crash sometime after you have exited your shell/pay/load/vnc session. If you are testing production systems, make sure you are able to reboot them after a successful exploit session.
Current thread:
- vnc reverse question Neil (Sep 17)
- Message not available
- Re: vnc reverse question Neil (Sep 17)
- Re: vnc reverse question mmiller at hick.org (Sep 17)
- Re: vnc reverse question H D Moore (Sep 17)
- Re: vnc reverse question Neil (Sep 17)
- Re: vnc reverse question Neil (Sep 17)
- Message not available
- <Possible follow-ups>
- vnc reverse question jerome.athias at caramail.com (Sep 17)
- vnc reverse question mmiller at hick.org (Sep 17)
