Metasploit on Windows

[arahzone-msf at yahoo.com (arahzone-msf at yahoo.com)]

Hi,
   
  Just my two cents: don't let down the Cygwin branch. The current Cygwin installer(MSF3) is really great. Do you have 
any problem with it?  
  Do you think that solving the readline problem of Ruby on Windows would give you the possibility to run msf3 natively 
on Windows? The Ruby interpreter on Windows is really fishy. I don't know these guys but they definitely don't know how 
to test software . As Ruby is gaining popularity, these kind of problems would be solved in the near future.
         
Thanks for your great woks.
  
H D Moore <hdm at metasploit.com> wrote:
  Hi everyone, 

We have been struggling to properly support Windows since the early days 
of 2.0. Cygwin has done a decent job so far, but software 
incompatibilities and Cygwin version mismatches have caused a ton of 
problems for some of our users. The Cygwin installer requires a ton of 
disk space and is a huge drain our bandwidth (+100Gb/mo). 

With Metasploit 3, we wanted to provide a native Windows version of the 
Framework. There has been little progress on this front, due to the main 
user interface (msfconsole) depending on libreadline and libreadline 
being a broken mess on Windows.

In the last year, there have been a number of free virtualization 
environments available to the public. VMWare has released VMWare Player 
and VMWare Server, Microsoft is giving away copies of VirtualPC, Xen is 
becoming more popular, and VirtualBox has released their source as GPL. 
Both Intel and AMD have virtualization features built into their latest 
processors and the new version of Windows Server will support native 
virtualization. On the distribution side, BackTrack (from 
remote-exploit.org) is really kicking ass and provides a ready-to-run 
environment for both version of the Framework.

So, given the stability issues with the Metasploit Cygwin release, and the 
wide availability of free virtualization software and OS images, would 
anyone mind if we drop support for the pre-packed Windows installer of 
the Metasploit Framework?

If we go this route, we will still support Metasploit running on top of 
Cygwin, but we will not support Cygwin itself or offer a pre-packaged 
Cygwin environment. We may offer custom live CDs or virtual machine 
images for download, but these would not be immediately available. Our 
current documentation (hah!) for using the Windows version will become a 
list of methods for loading up Metasploit in a virtualized environment.

If you think this is a horrible idea, keep in mind that the technically 
adept can still install Metasploit into their own Cygwin environment, and 
that the less adept will be able to download ready-to-run virtual machine 
images sometime in the future. 

Please reply with your opinion on this (good or bad), we realize quite a 
few people depend on the Windows installer.

Thanks!

-HD

PS. Yes, we still plan on releasing 3.0 "soon" :-) With any luck we can 
have the final release completed in February.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.metasploit.com/pipermail/framework/attachments/20070118/a3780fde/attachment.htm>