
Metasploit mailing list archives
Re: RHOST is now a mandatory field for an auxilary
From: Robin Wood <dninja () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:46:39 +0100
On 6 April 2010 01:51, HD Moore <hdm () metasploit com> wrote:
On 4/5/2010 5:48 PM, Robin Wood wrote:My DHCP exhaustion module didn't use to have to have an RHOST set but having just done an update it has become a mandatory field: msf auxiliary(exhaust) > run [-] Auxiliary failed: Msf::OptionValidateError The following options failed to validate: RHOST. if I set it to 0.0.0.0 the module works fine but seeing as I don't need it how can I remove the mandatory flag or even better remove the field as it isn't needed?Options are defined by mixins; what mixins are you including?
The only mixin I'm using is Msf::Exploit::Capture which I need for packet sniffing. Is it right that RHOST is a mandatory field for this mixin? Robin
-HD _______________________________________________ https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
_______________________________________________ https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
Current thread:
- RHOST is now a mandatory field for an auxilary Robin Wood (Apr 05)
- Re: RHOST is now a mandatory field for an auxilary HD Moore (Apr 05)
- Re: RHOST is now a mandatory field for an auxilary egypt (Apr 05)
- Re: RHOST is now a mandatory field for an auxilary Robin Wood (Apr 06)
- Re: RHOST is now a mandatory field for an auxilary Tod Beardsley (Apr 06)
- Re: RHOST is now a mandatory field for an auxilary Robin Wood (Apr 06)
- Re: RHOST is now a mandatory field for an auxilary HD Moore (Apr 05)