Metasploit mailing list archives
Fwd: metasploit auxiliary/server/capture/smb and pass the hash
From: Joshua Smith <lazydj98 () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 17:11:00 -0400
Sorry, meant to send this to the list ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Isn't that NTLMv2, isn't that what the NT_CLIENT_CHALLENGE indicates? In that case you can't directly pass the hash, you need a 3rd party. -josh On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:54 AM, macubergeek <macubergeek () comcast net> wrote:
I've been working with the metasploit auxiliary/server/capture/smb module
and have had good success capturing smb hashes.
[*] Empty hash captured from 192.168.1.1:1981 captured, ignoring ...
[*] 2012-03-30 22:57:24 -0400
NTLMv2 Response Captured from 192.168.1.1:1981
USER:DomainUser DOMAIN:MASSIVE OS:Windows 2002 Service Pack 3 2600
LM:Windows
2002 5.1
LMHASH:AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
LM_CLIENT_CHALLENGE:cf4000a12bdec1ad
NTHASH:CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
NT_CLIENT_CHALLENGE:0101000000000000f89c09009812cd01cf4000a12bdec1ad0000
0000020000000000000000000000
Chris Gates's Carnal Ownage blog suggests cracking the A's with John and
guessing at the B's
My questions are:
does the "Empty hash captured" signify that the LM hash was disabled on
this box?
Passing the hash
I've tried passing the hash using exploit/windows/smb/psexec configured
like so
Module options (exploit/windows/smb/psexec):
Name Current Setting
Required Description
---- ---------------
-------- -----------
RHOST 192.168.1.1
yes The target address
RPORT 445
yes Set the SMB service port
SHARE ADMIN$
yes The share to connect to, can be an admin share
(ADMIN$,C$,...) or a normal read/write folder share
SMBDomain MASSIVE
no The Windows domain to use for authentication
SMBPass
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB:CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD no
The password for the specified username
SMBUser DomainUser
no The username to authenticate as
Exploit target:
Id Name
-- ----
0 Automatic
This results in authentication/Login errors.
I realize I can't pass the hash against DomainUser on his box while he's
logged in but does anyone know if I can say use a domain admin cred against
DomainUser's box? I've tried doing psexec against DomainUser's box after he
logged out of the machine and still no go. I'm not sure if pass the hash
works here or if I'm using the correct answer for SMBPass.
Jim
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
%49%66%20%79%6F%75%20%63%61%6E%20%72%65%61%64%20%74%68%69%73%20%79%6F%75%20%6E%65%65%64%20%74%6F%20%67%65%74%20%61%20%67%69%72%6C%66%72%69%65%6E%64%2E
_______________________________________________
https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
-- - Josh -- - Josh
_______________________________________________ https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
Current thread:
- metasploit auxiliary/server/capture/smb and pass the hash macubergeek (Apr 05)
- Message not available
- Fwd: metasploit auxiliary/server/capture/smb and pass the hash Joshua Smith (Apr 05)
- Re: Fwd: metasploit auxiliary/server/capture/smb and pass the hash Kurt Grutzmacher (Apr 06)
- Fwd: metasploit auxiliary/server/capture/smb and pass the hash Joshua Smith (Apr 05)
- Message not available
