NANOG Mailing List

The North American Network Operators' Group discusses fundamental Internet infrastructure issues such as routing, IP address allocation, and containing malicious activity.

List Archives

Latest Posts

Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis Role Account via NANOG (Oct 03)
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Global
IPv4 Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.

The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
UKNOF, TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.

Daily listings are sent to bgp-stats () lists apnic net.

For historical data, please see https://thyme.apnic.net.

If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith...

Re: Best recommendation for out of band router access? public--- via NANOG (Oct 03)
This may be a tad low budget - but - assuming you can even get a steady reliable signal at your Data Center, you can
try Franklin T9/T10/R910 hotspot device which runs off USB with battery removed 24x7. Will use a 4G connection and
static IP through T-mobile. You can connect a UMPC or old Dell laptop with RS-232 serial or USB console cable to your
KVM device. We use this at some remote colocation client sites and it has worked perfectly...

Overflow Hotel Options for N95 Still Available! + N95 Workshops + More Nanog News via NANOG (Oct 03)
*** Overflow Hotel Options for N95 Still Available!*
------------------------------------------------------------
*Join Us (Oct. 27-29) in Arlington, TX*

📢 Heads up, NANOG community! Our NANOG 95 hotel block is officially sold
out! Thank you for the incredible response.

Missed your chance to book? Don't Worry. We’ve secured overflow hotel
options nearby so you can stay close to all the action.

Rooms are limited, so be sure to reserve...

Re: TORNOG Fall Event -- Call for Presentations Mark Prosser via NANOG (Oct 01)
Apologies & a correction. The event is on November 12th, 2025.

Please also find our sessionize link below:

https://sessionize.com/tornog-unnumbered-2/

(Still waiting on full activation). Please use talks () tornog ca for now.

Warm regards,

Mark

TORNOG Fall Event -- Call for Presentations Mark Prosser via NANOG (Oct 01)
Toronto Network Operators Group (TORNOG) is hosting our second event on Nov
13th, 2025. We'd love to have operators share their stories beyond the
mingle session, by submitting a presentation.

This event is currently entitled "TORNOG Unnumbered ::2"

Please submit your proposals to talks () tornog ca . I will hopefully have the
sessionize page open by tomorrow.

The proposal window is open from today until October 24th , 11:59 PM...

Pre-sales contact at AS7473 Suriya Kamon via NANOG (Oct 01)
Hi team,

We are having difficulty getting straight answers from our currently assigned sales and pre-sales personnel for AS7473
products.

Any contacts that anyone can anyone can forward on so we can begin a new conversation would be great.

(Note, we are not registered on the system as a lead/deal yet so it is my understanding that we can still speak to
others in sales)

Please contact me off-list.

Thanks!

Cheers,
S

Sent with [Proton...

Re: RFC8805 geofeed validation Livingood, Jason via NANOG (Oct 01)
Related reminder that the IAB is holding a workshop on IP Geolocation – with statements of interested due at the end of
this week. For more info:
https://www.iab.org/announcements/call-for-papers-iab-workshop-on-ip-address-geolocation-ip-geo/

Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on IP Address Geolocation (ip-geo)
17 Jul 2025, 6:42 p.m.
This workshop aims to understand the current use cases for publishing, discovering, and consuming IP address...

Re: RFC8805 geofeed validation Justin Krejci via NANOG (Sep 30)
I have found some Geolocation service providers will ignore entries that are missing certain fields.
With this real but anecdotal data point, I would suggest the results of having various non-ASCII or absent fields will
vary by organization that ingests your 8805 feed.

Beyond that, I have no solid data.

-----Original Message-----
From: Yang Yu via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org<mailto:Yang%20Yu%20via%20NANOG%20%3cnanog () lists nanog...

Re: NEC 2026 changes for data/communication wiring Sean Donelan via NANOG (Sep 29)
The digital edition of the new NFPA 70 (National Electrical Code) 2026 is
now available on the NFPA website. Its under both the free access and
paid access parts of the NFPA website, choose wisely.

https://www.nfpa.org/codes-and-standards/nfpa-70-standard-development/70

The printed edition of NEC 2026 and handbook will be out in December.

State and local jurisdictions will be updating their low voltage (data or
communications) licensing...

ARIN 8.5.7 Nicholas Warren via NANOG (Sep 29)
What is the purpose of 8.5.7? If the network must meet the requirements of 8.5.5 and 8.5.6, what is the use of 8.5.7
especially since it has a limit while 8.5.5 does not?

"Each discrete network must meet the projection requirements in section 8.5.5 ... [and] must meet the utilization
requirements in section 8.5.6"

Nich Warren

Re: Sites unreachable while traversing Dallas IXP Pedro Prado via NANOG (Sep 28)
IMHO, the key info here is that a known set of subnets was affected. This rules out some stuff:

- LACP manages link bundling, as in “can this interface be added to the bundle?”. The effect of bundling should be to
have multiple links to choose from when egressing a packet. RFC7130 is a nice addition to bundles as it uses BFD to
manage each link - meaning a bad member is removed quickly (LACP timers are not that fast and LACP itself is not...

Re: Sites unreachable while traversing Dallas IXP William Herrin via NANOG (Sep 27)
Hi Bruce,

I'm also not familiar with this particular IXP but generally with IXPs
we're not talking about point to point connections. The multiple
participants' routers are part of a shared layer-2 fabric (a switch or
switches) over which they trade layer-3 packets directly with each
other. The route advertisements may transit the route servers but the
routed packets do not.

You can get into some really finicky errors where both...

Re: Sites unreachable while traversing Dallas IXP Bruce Wainer via NANOG (Sep 27)
Excuse my ignorance about this IXP and your equipment, but is
Micro-BFD (RFC 7130) supported? And if so, is it enabled or can you
enable it? While configuration wise it will use the single IP
addresses of the aggregate, separate BFD instances are set up for each
underlying link and will confirm whether Layer 3 is working on that
point-to-point connection.
Bruce Wainer

Re: Sites unreachable while traversing Dallas IXP nanog--- via NANOG (Sep 27)
What if one port was dropping all traffic, but BGP kept retrying until it got hashed onto the working port, or it was
only L3 hashing and happened to put BGP sessions always on the working port? IMO, BGP being up isn't evidence of all
links working and no traffic drops.

Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis Role Account via NANOG (Sep 26)
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Global
IPv4 Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.

The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
UKNOF, TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.

Daily listings are sent to bgp-stats () lists apnic net.

For historical data, please see https://thyme.apnic.net.

If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith...

More Lists

Dozens of other network security lists are archived at SecLists.Org.