nanog mailing list archives
Re: CIDR FAQ
From: alex () kiae su
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 95 14:31:59 +0400
Sorry, what's the original question? really, we have a great experience with gated and PC based routers there...
At 11:00 AM 8/15/95, Dave Siegel wrote: >Let's excuse the fact that gated consumes more memory than a cisco for the >same amount of routes for a second... > >Okay, so let's talk functionality. > >Are there HSSI PCI cards available? Can you do SMDS over this card? Frame? >What about a DS3 ATM card, or higher? And Paul Traina wrote something vaguely similar. I think you guys are both missing what I think was Jon's original point: Routers forward packets faster than PCs, but the forwarding function and the routing protocol function do not have to reside on the same box. You can add a PC (workstation, whatever) which runs the routing protocol and stuffs routes into the router. It doesn't have to support the link-layer du jour. Ethernet will do the job just fine. As I recall the original discussion was of colocating a router, to forward packets, with a workstation, to compute routes. --John
Current thread:
- Re: CIDR FAQ, (continued)
- Re: CIDR FAQ John G. Scudder (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Dave Siegel (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Nicolas Williams (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ bmanning (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Nicolas Williams (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Nathan Stratton (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Nicolas Williams (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Dave Siegel (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Dave Siegel (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ John G. Scudder (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ alex (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Per Gregers Bilse (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Tony Li (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Jeremy Porter (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Tony Li (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Jeremy Porter (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Tony Li (Aug 15)
