nanog mailing list archives

Re: Test Route

From: bmanning () ISI EDU
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 1995 14:25:42 -0800 (PST)


      Perhaps it's time we admitted the arpanet isn't just dead...
      It's long dead.  Instead of blocking 10.0.0/8, break it up into
      Bs and Cs!
      10.128.0/9      Bs
      10.0/9          Cs      (10.0.1 through 10.127.255)


Well.... That might be a good idea except 10.0.0/8 is already
consumed via RFC 1597.  Won't work to split it into "B/C" nets.
Of course classfull nets are a thing of the past and what we deal
with now are CIDR prefixes and Masks.

--bill

Current thread:

Test Route bmanning (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route Ehud Gavron (Jan 30)
  - Re: Test Route bmanning (Jan 30)
  - Re: Test Route bmanning (Jan 30)
    - Re: Test Route Paul Traina (Jan 30)
    - Re: Test Route bmanning (Jan 30)
    - Re: Test Route Cengiz Alaettinoglu (Jan 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Test Route Jon Postel (Jan 30)
  - Test Route Dino Farinacci (Jan 30)
  - Re: Test Route Paul Traina (Jan 30)
  - Re: Test Route Theodore Ts'o (Jan 30)
    - Re: Test Route David R Conrad (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route John Curran (Jan 30)

(Thread continues...)