nanog mailing list archives
Re: Customer AS
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () quake net>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1996 12:14:28 -0700
In my (rather extensive) practice, multihoming by itself is
usually a major source of connectivity problems.
Whoever arguing _for_ mulihoming for everyone forgets that
taking more routing information in has dangers not present
when you don't do routing yourself.
I never saw any customer who had the ability to configure a
multihomed site properly on their own; and most of the bogus
routing information comes from multihomed customer sites.
It is _much_ better to multihome to the same provider who then
can take care of messy global routing.
--vadim
PS A UPS for CPE usually fixes 95% of transmission problems.
I've seen people willing to spend money on multihoming but doing
things on commercial power.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Customer AS, (continued)
- Re: Customer AS Perry E. Metzger (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Vadim Antonov (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Matthew Kaufman (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Sean Donelan (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Matthew Kaufman (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Joseph McDonald (Aug 23)
- Re: Customer AS Jon Zeeff (Aug 23)
- Re: Customer AS Nick Williams (Aug 23)
- Re: Customer AS Joseph McDonald (Aug 23)
- Re: Customer AS Vadim Antonov (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Curtis Villamizar (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Vadim Antonov (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Curtis Villamizar (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Randy Bush (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Perry E. Metzger (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Rob Skrobola (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Randy Bush (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Perry E. Metzger (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Michael Dillon (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Henry Kilmer (Aug 21)
