nanog mailing list archives
Re: sell shell accounts?
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 19:03:08 -0400
At 05:06 PM 7/23/96 -0500, Tim Salo wrote:
The desire for a full mesh of VCs between routers becomes more compelling if you have more than three routers. The diagram is left as an exercise to the reader; I rather dislike having to draw in ASCII. Note that the two paths between A and C, (directly versus via B), seem to take distinctly different paths. (Perhaps, I missed your point).
Perhaps I missed your point. Tim, I could've sworn that you had been following the IETF ION WG mailing list, where this has been discussed on hundreds of occasions. I hesitate to even mention this on NANOG (I really don't want to re-hash this on this list), but I can't hold my tongue. The scalability of an ATM network where each end-point is fully meshed to all other end-points decreases in direct proportion to the number of end-points. This is not so much a layer 2 problem, per se, but rather the ability to maintain functional routing (convergence, et al.) in a fully meshed network topology. This does not scale. - paul - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: sell shell accounts?, (continued)
- Re: sell shell accounts? Dave Siegel (Jul 19)
- Re: sell shell accounts? Arun Welch (Jul 22)
- RE: sell shell accounts? David Whipple (Jul 19)
- Re: sell shell accounts? Perry E. Metzger (Jul 19)
- Re: sell shell accounts? Brett D. Watson (Jul 20)
- Re: sell shell accounts? Brett D. Watson (Jul 20)
- Re: sell shell accounts? Tim Salo (Jul 23)
- Re: sell shell accounts? Tim Salo (Jul 23)
- Re: sell shell accounts? Sean Doran (Jul 23)
- Re: sell shell accounts? Sean Doran (Jul 24)
- Re: sell shell accounts? Paul Ferguson (Jul 23)
- Re: sell shell accounts? Tim Salo (Jul 23)
- Re: sell shell accounts? Sean Doran (Jul 23)
