nanog mailing list archives

Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe


From: "Brian Carpenter CERN-CN" <brian () dxcoms cern ch>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 08:58:29 +0200 (MET DST)

Randy,


My view is still that charging for routing announcements is
necessary and sufficient - 

Sufficient for what?

Sufficient to give folks an incentive to use addresses that aggregate
for routing purposes. (This is carefully phrased *not* to be CIDR-specific.)

but as I've said before, I think that registries should charge for their
*services*, and allocating an address block is a service. 

What is the difference in the service charge for allocating
a /8 compared to allocating a /24?

Indeed - I was debating whether to mention that in my previous mail.
I don't have a quick answer.

  Brian
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: