nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe
From: "Brian Carpenter CERN-CN" <brian () dxcoms cern ch>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 08:58:29 +0200 (MET DST)
Randy,
My view is still that charging for routing announcements is necessary and sufficient -Sufficient for what?
Sufficient to give folks an incentive to use addresses that aggregate for routing purposes. (This is carefully phrased *not* to be CIDR-specific.)
but as I've said before, I think that registries should charge for their *services*, and allocating an address block is a service.What is the difference in the service charge for allocating a /8 compared to allocating a /24?
Indeed - I was debating whether to mention that in my previous mail. I don't have a quick answer. Brian - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe, (continued)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Alex.Bligh (Jun 04)
- Sprint's route filters and Europe Daniel Karrenberg (Jun 03)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Michael Dillon (Jun 03)
- Sprint's route filters and Europe Daniel Karrenberg (Jun 03)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Mike Norris (Jun 04)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe David R. Conrad (Jun 17)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Brian Carpenter CERN-CN (Jun 17)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe David R. Conrad (Jun 17)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Brian Carpenter CERN-CN (Jun 18)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Jon Zeeff (Jun 17)
