nanog mailing list archives
Re: critique of NANOG meeting
From: avg () postman ncube com (Vadim Antonov)
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1996 00:43:32 +0800
Scott -- i would agree if the proposed solutions were sane. The offered "vision" is pretty much the negation of what made Internet so successful. Sure, bring in suits and lawyers, institute centralized control, replace engineers who _do_ things with engineers whose only qualification is willingness to use the strangulation device. *That* sure will make Internet users happy as clams. Let's get real. --vadim
Current thread:
- Re: critique of NANOG meeting, (continued)
- Re: critique of NANOG meeting Jeff Young (Jun 19)
- Re: critique of NANOG meeting Michael Dillon (Jun 19)
- Re: critique of NANOG meeting Jeff Young (Jun 19)
- Re: critique of NANOG meeting Avi Freedman (Jun 19)
- Re: critique of NANOG meeting Avi Freedman (Jun 19)
- Re: critique of NANOG meeting Per Gregers Bilse (Jun 19)
- Re: critique of NANOG meeting Tom Eastgard (Jun 20)
- Re: critique of NANOG meeting Paul Ferguson (Jun 19)
- Re: critique of NANOG meeting Vadim Antonov (Jun 19)
- Re: critique of NANOG meeting Scott Bradner (Jun 19)
- Re: critique of NANOG meeting Jeff Young (Jun 20)
- Re: critique of NANOG meeting Vadim Antonov (Jun 20)
- Re: critique of NANOG meeting Scott Bradner (Jun 20)
- Re: critique of NANOG meeting Justin W. Newton (Jun 20)
- Re: critique of NANOG meeting Michael Dillon (Jun 20)
- Re: critique of NANOG meeting Stephen Stuart (Jun 20)
- Re: critique of NANOG meeting Michael Dillon (Jun 20)
- Re: critique of NANOG meeting Marc E. Hidalgo (Jun 20)
- Re: critique of NANOG meeting Michael Dillon (Jun 20)
- Re: critique of NANOG meeting Matthew Cable/USA.NET Inc. (Jun 21)
