nanog mailing list archives

Re: The SWAMP

From: Havard.Eidnes () runit sintef no
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 1996 13:26:53 +0200

Isn't the argument of the non-default routing tables growing by an
additional 13 entries or not is specious noise? The routing bucket is
leaking through bloody great open chasms and we are wondering about
the incremental damage throuigh a pinhole!


The 13 additional entries are not the issue.  The issue is one of
setting a bad high-profile example.

Any suggestions for closing the open chasms in the routing
bucket?

- Havard
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Current thread:

The SWAMP Bradley Dunn (Sep 08)
- Re: The SWAMP Paul A Vixie (Sep 08)
  - Re: The SWAMP Avi Freedman (Sep 08)
    - Re: The SWAMP Randy Bush (Sep 08)
    - Re: The SWAMP Avi Freedman (Sep 08)
    - Re: The SWAMP Randy Bush (Sep 08)
    - Re: The SWAMP Avi Freedman (Sep 08)
    - Re: The SWAMP Havard . Eidnes (Sep 09)
    - Re: The SWAMP Geoff Huston (Sep 09)
    - Re: The SWAMP Havard . Eidnes (Sep 09)
    - Re: The SWAMP Dorian R. Kim (Sep 09)
    - Re: The SWAMP Geoff Huston (Sep 09)
    - Re: The SWAMP Randy Bush (Sep 09)
    - Re: The SWAMP Bill Manning (Sep 09)
    - Re: The SWAMP Paul A Vixie (Sep 09)
    - Re: The SWAMP Randy Bush (Sep 09)
  - Work Work Work Bill Manning (Sep 09)
    - Re: Work Work Work Randy Bush (Sep 09)
    - Re: Work Work Work Jon Zeeff (Sep 09)
- Re: The SWAMP Havard . Eidnes (Sep 09)

(Thread continues...)