nanog mailing list archives
Re: Top-50 Report
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () quake net>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 1996 10:52:23 -0700
Paul A Vixie <paul () vix com> wrote:
Given that the routing table stood at 28000 when CIDRD was killed off, I'd say that there have either been some recent classful allocations, or a lot of ancient networks suddenly getting advertised.
Due to a progressing loss of clue in some NSPs. Like all those 144.228/24s which should never make it out of ISIS. Some NSPs never had any clue in the first place, though (hm, 174). I have a theory on why it happens. Tony B, Sean, Andrew, me are just points in case. --vadim - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Top-50 Report, (continued)
- Re: Top-50 Report Tony Bates (Sep 13)
- Re: Top-50 Report Tony Barber (Sep 26)
- Re: Top-50 Report Tony Bates (Sep 27)
- Re: Top-50 Report hostmaster (Sep 30)
- Re: Top-50 Report Tony Bates (Sep 27)
- Re: Top-50 Report Paul Ferguson (Sep 13)
- Re: Top-50 Report Andrew Partan (Sep 13)
- Re: Top-50 Report Tony Bates (Sep 14)
- Re: Top-50 Report Paul A Vixie (Sep 14)
- Re: Top-50 Report Tony Bates (Sep 14)
- Re: Top-50 Report Andrew Partan (Sep 13)
- Re: Top-50 Report Neil J. McRae (Sep 14)
- Re: Top-50 Report Jon Zeeff (Sep 14)
- Re: Top-50 Report Jim Van Baalen (Sep 16)
- Re: Top-50 Report Mr. Jeremy Hall (Sep 16)
- Re: Top-50 Report Jon Zeeff (Sep 16)
- Re: Top-50 Report Dean Gaudet (Sep 14)
