nanog mailing list archives

Re: New Denial of Service Attack on Panix


From: "Sharif Torpis" <storpis () pbi net>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 08:11:13 -0700

On Sep 17, 10:48am, David Miller wrote:
Subject: RE: New Denial of Service Attack on Panix
On Mon, 16 Sep 1996, Jim Browning wrote:

Rather than "educate the enemy" via public discussion, I think it would be
best if those capable of contributing to solutions to this problem:

1.   Collaborated in private
2.   Developed a consensus "I-D"

If a solution is developed whose effectiveness is not weakened by making
the details public, it can be published.  If that is not the case, the
solution can be made available in private to "known entities".

Make sense?

No.

There's no way to tell all the good guys from all the bad guys.
If one "bad-guy" get's on the "good guy" listthen you've just lost all
adavantage of having the "private" discussion.  And in the meantime
you've shut out all the guys who are "good" but somehow not on the "good
guy" list.

-- End of excerpt from David Miller


Agreed. CERT has followed this theory with poor results.


-- 
Sharif Torpis (storpis () pbi net)                        \ | /    P A C I F I C
Pacific Bell Internet                                 -->*<--      B E L L
Network Engineering                                    / | \   I N T E R N E T
San Francisco, CA   USA
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: