nanog mailing list archives
customers and web servers and level one naps
From: Gordon Cook <cook () netaxs com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 13:35:07 -0400 (EDT)
What are the positions of Ameritech, sprint, pac bell and MFS on two issues? First having someone at a NAP who is there as a customer of one of the National service providers... and who may or may not engage in cost free peering with any of the other NSPs or even with other isps? Second: allowing such a customer, or an NSP, to attach web services directly to the FDDI ring at the NAP. PAIX is doing this. As far as I know the other major interchange provider are not. I am wondering why. ************************************************************************ The COOK Report on Internet For subsc. pricing & more than 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA ten megabytes of free material (609) 882-2572 (phone & fax) visit http://pobox.com/cook/ Internet: cook () cookreport com For case study of MercerNet & TIIAP induced harm to local community http://pobox.com/cook/mercernet.html ************************************************************************ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- customers and web servers and level one naps Gordon Cook (Sep 05)
- Re: customers and web servers and level one naps bmanning (Sep 05)
- Re: customers and web servers and level one naps Stephen Stuart (Sep 05)
- Re: customers and web servers and level one naps Gordon Cook (Sep 05)
- Re: customers and web servers and level one naps Avi Freedman (Sep 05)
- major? bmanning (Sep 05)
- Re: customers and web servers and level one naps Stephen Stuart (Sep 05)
- Re: customers and web servers and level one naps Gordon Cook (Sep 05)
- Re: customers and web servers and level one naps Michael Dillon (Sep 05)
- Re: customers and web servers and level one naps Srinivasarao Mulugu (Sep 10)
- Re: customers and web servers and level one naps Michael Dillon (Sep 10)
- Re: customers and web servers and level one naps Srinivasarao Mulugu (Sep 10)
