nanog mailing list archives

Re: Advice on dealing with Sprint


From: Alan Hannan <alan () anka mindvision com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 12:30:13 -0500 (CDT)


"Perry E. Metzger" writes:
Not, you understand, that I think the global routing table should be
kept in control,

Obviously that was a typo -- I think everyone agrees that the global
routing table *must* be kept in control...

  Do they?

  There is a rather large contingency of folks who feel the current
  paradigms of global routing necessitate a table growth explosion.

  Moving away from a BFR to a distributed switching system does have
  merits.  The assumption for this model is that the routing engine
  for the switching systems grows exponentially.

  I don't really buy into this point of view, but it is there...

  -alan

--
alan () mindvision com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: