nanog mailing list archives
RE: peering points
From: Brian Smith <bjs () usweb com>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 11:03:38 -0800
Nathan, I should note that I found this list extremely helpful (it is a first attempt), it is a shame that there isn't a web page out there for all the NAP's that any user can go discover who peers there, and at what connection speed. LINX in London provides this basic service, and it's a not for profit. Bjs
On Tue, 1 Apr 1997, Sean Donelan wrote:nathan () netrail NET (Nathan Stratton) writes:Well I think NAP's is referring to more then just 1 NAP. There are under20providers connected to say 4 or 5 major NAP's.You prodded me into updating my exchange point matrix. I don't claim its perfect, or more up to date than a few minutes ago. Things changequicklyin this business.Well, since you posted this in public I will respond in public.Netrail(4006) Y YY You need to update your list BAD. We are connected to all but one of your NAPs listed. We wanted to be at Sprint-NAP 4 months ago, but they did not have the gigaswitch port, or the physical space for our hardware. Please do not put information about other provider up without checking it out first.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: peering points Sean Donelan (Mar 31)
- Re: peering points Nathan Stratton (Apr 01)
- Re: peering points Robert Bowman (Apr 01)
- Re: peering points Edward Fang (Apr 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: peering points Tim Salo (Apr 01)
- RE: peering points Brian Smith (Apr 01)
- Re: Peering points Sean Donelan (Apr 01)
- Re: Peering points Mike Leber (Apr 01)
- Re: Peering points Avi Freedman (Apr 05)
- Re: Peering points Sean Donelan (Apr 05)
- RE: Peering points Rodney Joffe (Apr 05)
- RE: Peering points Dave Van Allen (Apr 06)
- Re: Peering points Avi Freedman (Apr 06)
- Re: Peering points Nathan Stratton (Apr 06)
- Re: Peering points Alec H. Peterson (Apr 06)
- Re: Peering points Avi Freedman (Apr 06)
- Re: Peering points Avi Freedman (Apr 06)
- Re: peering points Nathan Stratton (Apr 01)
