nanog mailing list archives
Re: F means filtered ?
From: Avi Freedman <freedman () netaxs com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 18:47:53 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 18 Feb 1997, Paul A Vixie wrote:Yes, I do. I have no opinion on whether spammers should or should not be able to reach any given root name server, including "mine", but for the time being I lack the hardware needed to firewall f.root-servers.net differently than I do the rest of my network.Perhaps someone else should be running f.root-servers.net then. shag
I have no doubt we can get a community offering of an appropriate border router interface... Avi, being serious, not critical - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: F means filtered ?, (continued)
- Re: F means filtered ? Avi Freedman (Feb 16)
- Re: F means filtered ? Christopher E. Stefan (Feb 16)
- Re: F means filtered ? Paul A Vixie (Feb 17)
- RE: F means filtered ? Jim Fleming (Feb 17)
- Re: F means filtered ? Perry E. Metzger (Feb 17)
- Re: F means filtered ? Justin W. Newton (Feb 17)
- Re: F means filtered ? Perry E. Metzger (Feb 18)
- Re: F means filtered ? Paul A Vixie (Feb 18)
- Re: F means filtered ? Karl Denninger (Feb 18)
- Re: F means filtered ? Racer X (Feb 19)
- Re: F means filtered ? Avi Freedman (Feb 19)
- Re: F means filtered ? Ehud Gavron (Feb 19)
- Re: F means filtered ? George Herbert (Feb 19)
- Re: F means filtered ? Racer X (Feb 19)
- Re: F means filtered ? Edward Henigin (Feb 19)
- RE: F means filtered ? Skutch (Feb 18)
- Re: F means filtered ? Perry E. Metzger (Feb 17)
