nanog mailing list archives
Re: ALpha test of MAE filtering capability
From: ALAN DORN HETZEL JR <dorn () atlanta net>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1997 11:06:34 EST
Certainly this data gives away *some* private information, but having
that knowledge is often very useful when one discovers bizarre
layer two problems. For instance, being able to ascertain that there is no
packet loss from you to all devices on the same switch, and n% packet loss
to all devices on another switch, without having to requests that MFS
diagnose the apparent L3 problem, is very useful.
Perhaps MFS could provide one unfiltered ping-responding
device on each switch at a MAE? This would address diagnostic
needs without requiring disclosure of other filtering issues.
Besides, you can always tell who is reachable with a broadcast
ping...
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability, (continued)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Andrew Partan (Feb 01)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Kent W. England (Feb 03)
- RE: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Robert Wilson (Feb 03)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Jeff Young (Feb 04)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Alec H. Peterson (Feb 04)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability John Hawkinson (Feb 04)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Scott Blandford (Feb 04)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Jeff Young (Feb 05)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Erik Sherk (Feb 04)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Alex.Bligh (Feb 04)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Jeff Young (Feb 04)
- Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability Scott Blandford (Feb 04)
