nanog mailing list archives
Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links
From: Avi Freedman <freedman () netaxs com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 1997 01:08:32 -0500 (EST)
So how do we name internal links in a way that is usefull for all operators, and conforms to the A-Z 0-9 and "-" and can be proposed as an RFC? --Peter
How about the Sprintlink: sl-pop-router#-port[-speed].sprintlink.net As an example? It's useful for Sprintlink NOC guys (they can see the router and port from DNS) and it's useful because it shows rough or exact link size information to outsiders. But instead of h0/0, use h0-0; s2-6; etc... Just a suggestion... i.e. icm-petersbathroom-2-s2-1-512.icp.net Avi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Peter Lothberg (Jan 06)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Dima Volodin (Jan 06)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Avi Freedman (Jan 06)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Alex.Bligh (Jan 07)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Philip J. Nesser II (Jan 07)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Dorian R. Kim (Jan 07)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Philip J. Nesser II (Jan 07)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Dorian R. Kim (Jan 07)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links John W. Stewart III (Jan 07)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Jerry Scharf (Jan 07)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Wayne Bouchard (Jan 07)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Perry E. Metzger (Jan 07)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links John Hawkinson (Jan 07)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Alex.Bligh (Jan 07)
