nanog mailing list archives
RE: ATM vs. DS3
From: "Chris A. Icide" <chris () nap net>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 1996 22:38:57 -0500
On Wednesday, July 09, 1997 9:34 PM, Josh Beck [SMTP:jbeck () connectnet com] wrote:
Hello,
I just thought of something. We are in the process of purchasing a
4 Mb CIR from another backbone. Now, we have the choice of ATM or standard
T3 delivery (over a DS3 either way). Now, if we get ATM, that 4 Mb CIR
turns into:
[ (53-5)/53 ] * 4 Mb/s = 48/53 * 4 Mb/s = 3.62 Mb/s
Emperical data shows that we are currently losing about 20.5% of capacity to IP over ATM overhead on fairly aggregated traffic. This means that *IF* your new connection is being measured as 4Mbps of cell bandwisth, you will only be getting 3.18Mbps. You may want to verify from the company providing this link what exactly are they limiting you to? btw, the extra overhead is lost in things like the last cell of a packet not being full, etc. Chris A. Icide Sr. Engineer Nap.Net, L.L.C.
Current thread:
- ATM vs. DS3 Josh Beck (Jul 09)
- Re: ATM vs. DS3 Ehud Gavron (Jul 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: ATM vs. DS3 Chris A. Icide (Jul 09)
- Re: ATM vs. DS3 Karl Denninger (Jul 09)
- Re: ATM vs. DS3 Ben Black (Jul 10)
- Re: ATM vs. DS3 Stephen Balbach (Jul 10)
- Re: ATM vs. DS3 Peter Kline (Jul 10)
- Re: ATM vs. DS3 Eric D. Madison (Jul 10)
- Re: ATM vs. DS3 Karl Denninger (Jul 09)
- Re: ATM vs. DS3 Alex.Bligh (Jul 11)
- Re: ATM vs. DS3 Dorian R. Kim (Jul 11)
