nanog mailing list archives
Re: Good Timing for .COM Problems ?
From: Joe Shaw <jshaw () insync net>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 23:44:09 -0500 (CDT)
On Sun, 20 Jul 1997, MFS wrote:
Maybe I am sorely out of touch, but was NSI actually granted ownership of com? This may sound like a flippant comment, but I am completely serious. I may be out of touch here.
I was under the impression that NSI's contract was up, and that root services were going to move in April of 1998.
I suppose that this central point of failure has it's positives, it could be good if the com and net information is corrupted, NSI could reload proper info on their servers and that would be that. BUT, NSI could corrupt the data and NOT reload for several hours, rendering the root operators helpless. Michael Stevenson michael () dook org
Current thread:
- Good Timing for .COM Problems ? Jim Fleming (Jul 20)
- Re: Good Timing for .COM Problems ? MFS (Jul 20)
- Re: Good Timing for .COM Problems ? Joe Shaw (Jul 20)
- Re: Good Timing for .COM Problems ? Paul Trotter (Jul 20)
- Re: Good Timing for .COM Problems ? David Mercer (Jul 20)
- Re: Good Timing for .COM Problems ? Dave Crocker (Jul 20)
- Re: Good Timing for .COM Problems ? Matthew Crosby (Jul 21)
- Re: Good Timing for .COM Problems ? root (Jul 21)
- Re: Good Timing for .COM Problems ? David Mercer (Jul 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Good Timing for .COM Problems ? Jim Fleming (Jul 20)
- RE: Good Timing for .COM Problems ? Jim Fleming (Jul 21)
- Re: Good Timing for .COM Problems ? Dave Crocker (Jul 22)
- Re: Good Timing for .COM Problems ? MFS (Jul 20)
