nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Routing problem
From: Marc Slemko <marcs () znep com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 1997 07:58:48 -0600 (MDT)
On Fri, 6 Jun 1997, Danny McPherson wrote:
Hey, Ravi, I thought you fixed that bug? Perhaps AS4005 is not running the fixed code. Perhaps there's another bug.it's not 'another' bug. (received only) means that soft-reconfiguration is configured for the peer and some policy denied the route so it's not being used - yet.
But that doesn't answer the question of why it is still appearing many hours after it has stopped being advertised; we have seen this happen too. Even though it doesn't hurt anything as is because it isn't being used, but what happens if the policy changes so it was being used? Would it magically process a withdrawal that presumably happened some time ago, or would it actually use the bogus route?
Current thread:
- BGP Routing problem Anthony Walker (Jun 05)
- Re: BGP Routing problem Bil Herd (Jun 05)
- Re: BGP Routing problem Alan Barrett (Jun 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: BGP Routing problem Danny McPherson (Jun 05)
- Re: BGP Routing problem Danny McPherson (Jun 06)
- Re: BGP Routing problem Alan Barrett (Jun 06)
- Re: BGP Routing problem John (Jun 06)
- Re: BGP Routing problem Alex.Bligh (Jun 06)
- Re: BGP Routing problem Ed Kern (Jun 06)
- Re: BGP Routing problem John (Jun 06)
- Re: BGP Routing problem Alan Barrett (Jun 06)
- Re: BGP Routing problem Marc Slemko (Jun 06)
