nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC 1918 addresses
From: Deepak Jain <deepak () jain com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 1997 14:40:09 -0400 (EDT)
I believe a number of firewall packages and a few anonymous remailers (sendmail based) support header stripping. I know for a fact spammer software does it. -Deepak. On Sat, 31 May 1997, Matthew James Gering wrote:
Exposing an RFC 1918 private address in, say, a "Received:" header inis less of a problem, though the spammers who do it are actually betterableto cover their origins, there's no way to prevent it and no normal damagefrom doing it.Unless the SMTP server used to proxy email through a firewall is able to strip headers, it's unavoidable. I would like to see that feature added to SMTP servers, however, I do hate letting internal host names and addresses out. Matt
Current thread:
- Re: RFC 1918 addresses Paul A Vixie (May 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RFC 1918 addresses Matthew James Gering (May 31)
- Re: RFC 1918 addresses Deepak Jain (Jun 01)
- Re: RFC 1918 addresses prue (Jun 02)
