nanog mailing list archives
Re: multihoming without BGP
From: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs () bifrost seastrom com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 10:24:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: Paul A Vixie <paul () vix com>
That's two folks who have come out today and said "well that's no damn good"
without trying it. I'm surprised, NANOG members usually have a
more positive attitude.
Would it make you feel better if I loaded the code before pointing out
apparent shortcomings?
---Rob
Current thread:
- Re: multihoming without BGP Paul A Vixie (Jun 10)
- Re: multihoming without BGP Robert E. Seastrom (Jun 11)
- Re: multihoming without BGP Randy Bush (Jun 11)
- Re: multihoming without BGP Paul A Vixie (Jun 11)
- Re: multihoming without BGP Dana Hudes (Jun 13)
- Re: multihoming without BGP Marc Slemko (Jun 13)
- Re: multihoming without BGP Paul A Vixie (Jun 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: multihoming without BGP Rodney Joffe (Jun 11)
- Re: multihoming without BGP Vadim Antonov (Jun 11)
