nanog mailing list archives
Re: satellite connections
From: "Miguel A.L. Paraz" <map () iphil net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 1997 02:14:19 +0800 (HKT)
Hi, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
I'm not sure how many TCP/IP stacks still set those bits; it may be necessary to have a router manipulate the bits after examining the port numbers of a connection.
Looks like a good place to use access lists that choose packets based on tcp, udp, and port number. If I could get a 45 Mbps circuit over high-latency geosatellite, one-way, I could use it for http and "push" traffic. The requests, outbound stuff, and interactive traffic would fit into a T1 under the ocean. Cheers, -- miguel a.l. paraz <map () iphil net> +63-2-893-0850 iphil communications, makati city, philippines <http://www.iphil.net>
Current thread:
- Re: connectivity outside the US, (continued)
- Re: connectivity outside the US Circuit (Jun 01)
- Re: connectivity outside the US Todd Graham Lewis (Jun 01)
- Re: connectivity outside the US Hal Murray (Jun 01)
- Re: connectivity outside the US Jakob Faarvang (Jun 01)
- Message not available
- Re: connectivity outside the US Justin W. Newton (Jun 01)
- Re: connectivity outside the US Paul A Vixie (Jun 01)
- Re: connectivity outside the US Deepak Jain (Jun 01)
- Re: connectivity outside the US Curtis Generous (Jun 02)
- Re: connectivity outside the US Miguel A.L. Paraz (Jun 02)
- Re: satellite connections Stephen Sprunk (Jun 02)
- Re: satellite connections Miguel A.L. Paraz (Jun 02)
- Re: connectivity outside the US Circuit (Jun 01)
- Re: connectivity outside the US Alex.Bligh (Jun 01)
