nanog mailing list archives
Re: usable T1 bandwidth
From: "Matthew E. Pearson" <mpearson () games-online com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 1997 16:17:39 -0500
At 12:36 PM 3/18/97 -0800, David Carmean wrote:
A polite "that question is more appropriately asked on the inet-access list" or similar would have been just fine.
I agree..
You bitch about new network operators who don't know how to keep their BGP announcements clean, and who don't know about the politics and procedures of peering vs. transit, and the NAPs and elsewhere. But let someone come here and try to learn, and you turn your nose up and try to shame them out of your sight.
Actually I usually see a 50% flame 50% helpfull reply anytime I post. So I just use my standard rule of thumb.. 90% of the people in the world are total morons and 10% have some clue. So with a 50/50 split I think the overall clue level is quite a bit higher here.
You should be ashamed of yourselves.
I am ashamed everytime I look at my paycheck. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Matthew Pearson Vice President of Development Games-Online Inc. http://www.games-online.com ----------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: usable T1 bandwidth, (continued)
- Re: usable T1 bandwidth Michael Dillon (Mar 18)
- usable T1 bandwidth Michael Shields (Mar 18)
- Re: usable T1 bandwidth Mike Heroux (Mar 18)
- Re: usable T1 bandwidth Todd Graham Lewis (Mar 18)
- Re: usable T1 bandwidth Christopher Montano (Mar 18)
- Re: usable T1 bandwidth Randy Bush (Mar 18)
- Re: usable T1 bandwidth Jim Dixon (Mar 18)
- Re: usable T1 bandwidth David Carmean (Mar 18)
- Re: usable T1 bandwidth bmanning (Mar 18)
- Re: usable T1 bandwidth Randy Bush (Mar 18)
- Re: usable T1 bandwidth Brian (Mar 18)
- Re: usable T1 bandwidth Matthew E. Pearson (Mar 18)
- Re: usable T1 bandwidth Alex Rubenstein (Mar 18)
- Re: usable T1 bandwidth Sean Doran (Mar 18)
