nanog mailing list archives
Re: QoS/CoS interest
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 23:16:27 -0400
At 06:06 PM 05/21/97 -0400, Peter wrote:
Seems this would be easy to do in netflow switching. Also sounds a lot like FECN/BECN in frame relay.
Sounds alot to me like sanity -- using the existing hooks in IPv4 to deliver differentiated classes of service by using the IP precedence bits in the TOS portion of the IP header. - paul - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- QoS/CoS interest Paul Ferguson (May 21)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest Dirk Harms-Merbitz (May 21)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest Michael Dillon (May 21)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest Peter (May 21)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest Paul Ferguson (May 21)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest Peter (May 21)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest Karl Denninger (May 21)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest bill . st . arnaud (May 22)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest Michael Dillon (May 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: QoS/CoS interest Stan Barber (May 21)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest pkavi (May 22)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest Gary Zimmerman (May 22)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest Scott Bradner (May 22)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest bill . st . arnaud (May 22)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest Mike Trest (May 22)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest Paul Ferguson (May 22)
(Thread continues...)
