Re: uDNS Root Name Servers Taking Shape - on a couple ISDN lines

[Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>]

I would really appreciate it, as I'm sure may other subscribers
of the NANOG would, if you DNS combatants would take this discussion
elsewhere, to a more appropriate list. I'm on the verge of constructing
filters so that I don't have to see this cruft -- short of that, I'm
now considering unsubscribing to the list.

The signal/noise ratio has degenerated dramatically.

Please remove nanog () merit edu from the CC: line.

- paul


At 08:42 AM 05/30/97 -0400, Richard Shu wrote:

> Because we're not used to being members of organizations in which
> major decisions are driven by short-notice ultimatums.  
>
> Because we had to act quickly when it became apparent that the 
> root servers were likely to be arbitrarily reloaded with a set of 
> TLDs less than the full set originally registered as eDNS TLDs.
>
> Because we are used to organizations that provide stability and
> reliability as key elements to foster an environment hospitable
> to business.
>
> Respectfully submitted,
> Richard Shu
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -