nanog mailing list archives
Re: moving to IPv6
From: "Gary E. Miller" <gem () rellim com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 1997 00:35:34 -0800 (PST)
Yo Jeremy! On Mon, 3 Nov 1997, Jeremy Porter wrote:
If you have a payload that is encrypted and signed, there is fundementally no reason for the application to know anything other than a magic cookie return address.
SSH keeps track, forever, of the remote IP address/key pair to prevent man-in-the-middle and trojan horse attacks. The authors mention in their material that it is an important defense. Check out http://www.cs.hut.fi/ssh for further info. RGDS GARY --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gary E. Miller Rellim 2680 Bayshore Pkwy, #202 Mountain View, CA 94043-1009 gem () rellim com Tel:+1(650)964-1186 Fax:+1(650)964-1176
Current thread:
- Re: moving to IPv6, (continued)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 03)
- Message not available
- Re: moving to IPv6 Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 03)
- Message not available
- Re: moving to IPv6 Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Vadim Antonov (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Thomas Narten (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 John Curran (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Thomas Narten (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Jeremy Porter (Nov 03)
- Message not available
- IPsec processing & NAT (was Re: moving to IPv6) Ran Atkinson (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Gary E. Miller (Nov 05)
- Message not available
- Overloaded semantics (was Re: moving to IPv6) Ran Atkinson (Nov 03)
- Re: Overloaded semantics (was Re: moving to IPv6) Thomas Narten (Nov 05)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Dirk Harms-Merbitz (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Pedro Marques (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Karl Denninger (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Phillip Vandry (Nov 05)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 07)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Karl Denninger (Nov 07)
- Re: moving to IPv6 John A. Tamplin (Nov 07)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Karl Denninger (Nov 07)
