nanog mailing list archives
Re: Geographic v. topological address allocation
From: Tony Li <tli () juniper net>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 11:07:32 -0800 (PST)
> An interesting metric might be if the organization's min-cut-set bandwidth > is exceeded by its regional access bandwidth. This is a brilliant idea, but how do you propose to measure the regional access bandwidth, or the even more fun task of determining the total bandwidth so that you can determine the pro rata share due any arbitrary subtree? I don't propose to measure it. I assume that the organization has the wherewithal to track its own circuits. I know, I know, I'm naive for living in an altruistic Internet .... Tony
Current thread:
- Re: Geographic v. topological address allocation Sean Donelan (Nov 10)
- Re: Geographic v. topological address allocation Geoff Huston (Nov 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Geographic v. topological address allocation Sean Donelan (Nov 16)
- Re: Geographic v. topological address allocation Tony Li (Nov 16)
- Re: Geographic v. topological address allocation Sean M. Doran (Nov 17)
- Re: Geographic v. topological address allocation Tony Li (Nov 17)
- Re: Geographic v. topological address allocation Tony Li (Nov 16)
- Re: Geographic v. topological address allocation Sean M. Doran (Nov 17)
- Re: Geographic v. topological address allocation Kent W. England (Nov 20)
- Re: Geographic v. topological address allocation Tony Li (Nov 21)
- Re: Geographic v. topological address allocation Vadim Antonov (Nov 21)
- Re: Geographic v. topological address allocation Tony Li (Nov 21)
- Re: Geographic v. topological address allocation Sean Doran (Nov 21)
- Re: Geographic v. topological address allocation Vadim Antonov (Nov 21)
- Re: Geographic v. topological address allocation Sean M. Doran (Nov 23)
- Message not available
- Re: Geographic v. topological address allocation Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 17)
