nanog mailing list archives
RE: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death
From: Darin Fisher <oz () axent com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 15:05:00 -0700
Other vulnerabilities:
Cisco PIX NOT vulnerable
Wellfleet NOT vulnerable
NPI EIFO vulnerable (doesn't shut the system down, but
you can no longer monitor from telnet)
IRIX 5.3 vulnerable
IRIX 6.4 NOT vulnerable
SunOS 4.1.3 vulnerable
Solaris 2.4 NOT vulnerable
Solaris 2.5.1 NOT vulnerable
Ultrix (all) vulnerable
HPUX 9.x vulnerable
HPUX 10.x NOT vulnerable
AIX 3.2.5 NOT vulnerable
AIX 4.1 NOT vulnerable
WinNT (w/ service pack 3) a little vulnerable (slows the
system 'till SYN timeout)
Win95 (w/ service pack 1) NOT vulnerable (
NCDware 3.3.2 vulnerable
Linux 2.0.30 NOT vulnerable
Novell 3.11 NOT vulneralbe
Novell 3.12 NOT vulnerable
Novell 4.10 NOT vulnerable
Motorola SVR5 3.0 NOT vulnerable
-----Original Message----- From: Michael Behrens [SMTP:michael () gothmog kingston net] Sent: Friday, November 21, 1997 12:51 PM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death On Fri, 21 Nov 1997, Stan Barber wrote:BugTraq has a note that version 10.3(7) is vunerable. I don't knowwhichversion of Cisco the IOS was running on.version 11.1(5) is vulnerable. Michael |InterNet Kingston #177 Wellington St. Ste #302| |Kingston, Ontario K7L3E3, Canada | |http://www.kingston.net Bigger, Better, Local |
Current thread:
- Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death, (continued)
- Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death Nathan Bates (Nov 25)
- Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death Karl Denninger (Nov 21)
- Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death blast (Nov 21)
- Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death John Hawkinson (Nov 21)
- Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death Alex Rubenstein (Nov 21)
- Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death Avi Freedman (Nov 21)
- Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death Michael Behrens (Nov 21)
