nanog mailing list archives
Re: OSPF Vs EIGRP
From: "Shaun S. Amini" <samini () diginetusa net>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 1997 19:00:24 -0400
Majority of Networks are running OSPF and a few larger ones like UUNET are running ISIS. For the most part, you will never need run ISIS. My recommendation would be to implement OSPF, it has a lot more knobs for tuning. If you are careful, you can even run OSPF and EIGRP together during the migration period and migrate one site at a time without any down time. At 04:50 PM 10/8/97 -0500, you wrote:
Dave do you know of any Global Corporations that are using EIGRP ? IF so, what do they do when a major merger takes place and the corporation
aquires a large amount of non Cisco routers throughout their newely aquired global network ? I have also been trying to locate a case study of the percentage of global IP networks currently using OSPF Vs EIGRP and any recent trends towards one or the other ?
With Regards, Shaun S. Amini samini () diginetusa net www.diginetusa.net
Current thread:
- OSPF Vs EIGRP Patrick O'Keefe (Oct 08)
- Re: OSPF Vs EIGRP Vijay Gill (Oct 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: OSPF Vs EIGRP Shaun S. Amini (Oct 08)
