nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering with a big web farm (was Re: BBN Peering Issues)
From: alex () nac net
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 17:37:49 -0400 (EDT)
Alex Rubenstein, turning John Curran's words around, suggested: | "The central problem is asymmetry of traffic between GTEI and the hosting | companies, Curran said. BBN/GTEI customers generally request webpages from | Exodus more than from other places." which is an interesting point IN FAVOUR OF peering with a large web hosting network at only one location. If one can force all outgoing to-the-webhosted-site queries through a single web cache, and the content is (or is made to be) relatively undynamic, one has a huge caching potential.
Amen; I didn't even see that. But, that could work to BBN's favor!
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Atheism is a non-prophet organization.
I route, therefore I am.
Alex Rubenstein, alex () nac net, KC2BUO, ISP/C Charter Member
Father of the Network and Head Bottle-Washer
Net Access Corporation, 9 Mt. Pleasant Tpk., Denville, NJ 07834
Don't choose a spineless ISP! We have more backbone! http://www.nac.net
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Current thread:
- Peering with a big web farm (was Re: BBN Peering Issues) Sean M. Doran (Aug 12)
- Re: Peering with a big web farm (was Re: BBN Peering Issues) alex (Aug 12)
- Re: Peering with a big web farm (was Re: BBN Peering Issues) Jon Lewis (Aug 12)
- Re: Peering with a big web farm (was Re: BBN Peering Issues) David Schiffrin (Aug 13)
- Re: Peering with a big web farm (was Re: BBN Peering Issues) Mike Gibbs (Aug 13)
- Re: Peering with a big web farm (was Re: BBN Peering Issues) Jon Lewis (Aug 12)
- Re: Peering with a big web farm (was Re: BBN Peering Issues) alex (Aug 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Peering with a big web farm (was Re: BBN Peering Issues) Sean M. Doran (Aug 13)
