nanog mailing list archives
Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet
From: Dean Anderson <dean () av8 com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 16:17:53 -0500
At 2:35 PM -0500 2/6/98, Deepak Jain wrote:
FDDI can run full duplex, as for the other two things its a matter of opinion & conditions. (One I agree with, but still opinion).
For desktops, I agree completely that fast ethernet is the way to go. Fast
ether hubs are cheaper and easier to wire than cddi hubs (no cross over
cables required).
For a backbone, though, I would point out that FDDI is a token ring
protocol, so performance is always predictable. Ethernet, and fast ethernet
have performance knees. (Actually, I'm assuming Fast Ethernet will have a
knee at around 70% utilization. I haven't tested that it really does).
Also, both Fiber and Copper can be implemented with dual attached rings
which might be an advantage for a backbone link.
--Dean
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Plain Aviation, Inc dean () av8 com
LAN/WAN/UNIX/NT/TCPIP http://www.av8.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Current thread:
- FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Charles Sprickman (Feb 05)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Kent W. England (Feb 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Charles Sprickman (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Lewis Eatherton (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Deepak Jain (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Dean Anderson (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Paul Ferguson (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Sean M. Doran (Feb 08)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Matthew Petach (Feb 08)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Deepak Jain (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet David Lesher (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Dorn Hetzel (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Martin Hannigan (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Karl Denninger (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Robert E. Seastrom (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Deepak Jain (Feb 06)
