nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internic hosage (fwd)
From: Phil Howard <phil () charon milepost com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 10:09:20 -0600 (CST)
Dean Robb writes:
The misuse aspect has come about because spammers (primarily) have bots that will harvest all the addresses in WhoIs and send them their drivel.
Contact handles are predictable. All you need to do in a bot is try all
the permutations of 2 or 3 letters, with or without -ORG at the end, and
increment numbers until nothing is found. That will get you perhaps 99%
of the handles.
Handles should instead be generated in an unpredictable way, such as MD5.
--
Phil Howard | stop3it8 () s9p1a4m9 net suck7it4 () dumb4ads com blow2me7 () spammer7 com
phil | blow7me9 () dumbads1 com eat0this () s4p2a4m7 com crash760 () dumbads9 org
at | no1spam5 () no34ads2 edu end2it40 () s3p5a8m6 edu eat4this () noplace7 org
milepost | suck9it9 () no5where com stop8it5 () spammer1 org w7x7y8z3 () s2p8a7m3 com
dot | blow8me3 () noplace5 org no46ads3 () no99ads7 org suck0it3 () no23ads5 edu
com | no46ads7 () no9place net w9x2y9z5 () anywhere com eat1this () noplace7 org
Current thread:
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd), (continued)
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd) Chris Josephes (Mar 20)
- Message not available
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd) Jay R. Ashworth (Mar 22)
- Message not available
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd) Dean Robb (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd) Dean Robb (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd) Dean Anderson (Mar 21)
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd) Dean Anderson (Mar 21)
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd) Randy Bush (Mar 21)
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd) Karl Denninger (Mar 21)
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd) Dean Robb (Mar 21)
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd) Phil Howard (Mar 22)
- Message not available
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd) Jay R. Ashworth (Mar 22)
