Re: IP over SONET considered harmful?

["John G. Scudder" <jgs () ieng com>]

At 2:57 PM -0800 3/20/98, Kent W. England wrote:
> As I recall, the world didn't end when the NSFNET NSSs were installed and
> they decremented TTL twice. Weren't they changed to decrement once,
> appearing as one instead of two routers?

You got this part right.  I thought we had heard the last of the TTL
whining then.  Apparently we haven't made much progress in the last eight
years.

> (For those who don't remember the NSFNET "routers" they consisted of an IBM
> RS6000 attached to each of several T1/T3 interfaces, interconnected across a
> FDDI with a route server. Nine RS6000s in all. 200 amp service required. :-)

But this part is wrong.  The description above is kind of a combination of
the T1 NSS (rack of RTs, each RT services at most a single T1 or Ethernet,
they talk to a route processor) and the T3 NSS (RS/6000 with autonomous
port cards, pretty similar to any modern router).

There's a half-decent description of the NSS architecture at
http://www.merit.edu/nsfnet/

Historically yours,

--John

--
John Scudder                        email:  jgs () ieng com
Internet Engineering Group, LLC     phone:  (734) 213-4939 x14
122 S. Main, Suite 280              fax:    (734) 669-8661
Ann Arbor, MI  48104                www:    http://www.ieng.com